Volume 23, Issue 30 (1-2026)                   RSMT 2026, 23(30): 45-60 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fadaei M, Anbarian M. Effects Of Quadriceps Muscle Fatigue On Electromyography Activity Of Lower Limb Muscles During Lifting Load. RSMT 2026; 23 (30) :45-60
URL: http://jsmt.khu.ac.ir/article-1-539-en.html
Professor, Department of Sport Biomechanics, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran. , anbarian@basu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (4908 Views)
Background and Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of quadriceps muscle fatigue on electromyographic activity of selected lower limb muscles during lifting loads using different techniques.
Methods: Surface electromyography activity of the rectus femoris, vastus latralis, vastus medialis, biceps femoris, semitendinous, gastrocnemius medialis and tibialis anterior muscles of 20 able-bodied women were recorded before and after the quadriceps muscle fatigue using leg-press movement, squat, stoop and strudel techniques with 20% of body weight. Analysis of Variance with repeated measures was used for data analyses (p<0.05).
Results: After fatigue when lifting the load, the activity of the rectus femoris, vastus medialis, biceps femoris and gastrocnemius medialis in squat and stoop techniques was significantly different compared to before fatigue condition. But no significant difference was observed between the activity of any of the muscles before and after fatigue in the straddle method.
Conclusion: According to the results, it seems that when quadriceps muscle fatigue, the use of straddle technique to lift the load is more appropriate.

 
Full-Text [PDF 1961 kb]   (80 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: sport biomechanic
Received: 2024/10/11 | Accepted: 2025/05/27 | Published: 2026/01/30

References
1. Lin CJ, Wang SJ, Chen HJ. A field evaluation method for assessing whole body biomechanical joint stress in manual lifting tasks. Industrial Health. 2006;44(4):604-12. doi:10.2486/indhealth.44.604. [DOI:10.2486/indhealth.44.604]
2. Russell SJ, Winnemuller L, Camp JE, Johnson PW. Comparing the results of five lifting analysis tools. Appl Ergon, 2007; 38(1): 91-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.12.006. [DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.12.006]
3. National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine.Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace: Low Back andUpper Extremities. Washington, DC: National AcademyPress, 2001.
4. Choobineh A, Tabatabaee S. Musculoskeleta Problems factory workersof an Iranian rubber factory. J Occup Health 2007; 49:418-23. doi: 10.1539/joh.49.418. [DOI:10.1539/joh.49.418]
5. Ghaffari MAA, Jensen I, Farshad AA, Vingard E. Occupational Medicine. Low back pain among Iranian industrial workers. 2006;56(7):455-60. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql062. [DOI:10.1093/occmed/kql062]
6. Mohammadi H, Motamedzade M, Faghih,MA. Manual Material Handling Assessment Among Workers of Iranian Casting Workshops. 2013;19(4):675-81. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2013.11077021. [DOI:10.1080/10803548.2013.11077021]
7. Kuijer PP, van Oostrom SH, Duijzer K, van Dieen JH. Maximum acceptable weight of lift reflects peak lumbosacral extension moments in a functional capacity evaluation test using free style, stoop and squat lifting. Ergonomics 2012; 55(3): 343-9. doi:10.1080/00140139.2011.642005. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2011.642005]
8. Hwnag SH, Hwang SJ, Kim YE, Kim YH. Contributions of lower extremity joints on the support moment during lifting. J Biomech, 2007; 40 (S327).doi:10.1016/S0021-9290(07)70323-8. [DOI:10.1016/S0021-9290(07)70323-8]
9. Straker L. Evidence to support using squat, semi-squat and stoop techniques to lift low-lying objects, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2003; 31(3):149-160. doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00191-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0169-8141(02)00191-9]
10. van Dieen JH, Hoozemans MJ, Toussaint HM. Stoop or squat: A review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1999; 14(10): 685-96. doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(99)00031-5. [DOI:10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00031-5]
11. Dreischarf M, Rohlmann A, Graichen F, Bergmann G, Schmidt H. In vivo loads on a vertebral body replacement during different lifting techniques. J Biomech, 2016; 49(6): 890-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.034. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.09.034]
12. Derare W. Treadmill exercise negatively affects visual contribution to static postural stability. Int J Sport Med, 2002; 23(1): 44-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-19374. [DOI:10.1055/s-2002-19374]
13. Lattanzio PJ, Petrella RJ, Sproule JR, Fowler PJ. Effect of fatigue on knee proprioception. Clin J Sport Med, 1997; 7: 22-27. doi: 10.1097/00042752-199701000-00005. [DOI:10.1097/00042752-199701000-00005]
14. Banks AD. Progressive Fatigue Effects on Manual Lifting Factors. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 2009; 19 (5) 361-377. doi: 10.1002/hfm.20170. [DOI:10.1002/hfm.20170]
15. van den Tillaar R, Andersen V, Saeterbakken AH. Comparison of muscle activation and kinematics during free-weight back squats with different loads. PLoS One, 2019; 14(5): e0217044. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217044. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0217044]
16. Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for sEMG sensor placement procedures. J Elec Kin, 2000; 10: 361-74. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4. [DOI:10.1016/S1050-6411(00)00027-4]
17. Faber GS, Kingma I, Bakker AJM, van Dieën JH. Low-back Loading in Lifting Two Loads Beside the Body Compared to Lifting One Load in Front of the Body. J Biomech, 2009; 42(1): 35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.013. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.10.013]
18. Hajilo B, Sepehrian M, Esmaeili H, Anbarian M. The effect of quadriceps muscle fatigue on foot plantar pressure distribution during stance phase of walking. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences, 2014; 21(121): 2-8. [In Persian] URL: https://rjms.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3221-fa.html
19. De Luca CJ. The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 1997; 13:135-163. doi: https://www.bu.edu/nmrc/files/2010/04/078.pdf. [DOI:10.1123/jab.13.2.135]
20. Chowdhury SK, Nimbarte AD. Effect of fatigue on the stationarity of surface electromyography signals. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2017; 61: 120-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2017.05.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2017.05.004.]
21. Kellis E, Kouvelioti V, Ioakimidis P. Reliability of a practicable EMG-moment model for antagonist moment prediction. Neuroscience Letters, 2005; 383 (3): 266-271. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.038. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.038]
22. Vakos JP, Nitz AJ, Threlkeld AJ, Shapiro R, Horn T. Electromyographic activity of selected trunk and hip muscles during a squat lift, Effect of varying the lumbar posture. Spine, 1994; 12, 687-695. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199403001-00008. [DOI:10.1097/00007632-199403001-00008]
23. Garg A, Herrin GD. Stoop or squat: A biomechanical and metabolic evaluation. IIE Transactions, 1979; 11: 293-302. doi: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/05695557908974474. [DOI:10.1080/05695557908974474]
24. Hwang S, Kim Y, Kim Y. Lower extremity joint kinetics and lumbar curvature during squat
25. and stoop lifting. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2009; 10:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-15. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-10-15]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Research in Sport Medicine and Technology

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb